A male student is suing Indiana University for Title IX violations, alleging the school’s investigation into rape accusations was biased against him because of his gender.
It’s the latest in a series of lawsuits invoking the federal civil rights law on behalf of men accused of sexual assault.
The complicated details of the case begin in September 2017, when both John Doe and Jane Doe acknowledge they had sexual intercourse at a fraternity house. The two later learned someone else had taken a photo of them during intercourse and had shared it with others.
The photo was reported to IU officials and an investigation began a few days later. The university ultimately found two people responsible for taking and distributing the photo.
In May 2018, the school launched a new investigation after Jane reported she was too drunk to give consent that night and accused John of sexual assault.
Indiana University Police investigated and the Monroe County Prosecutor’s Office declined to file rape charges.
According to documents filed with the lawsuit, an IU panel heard testimony from both students; they gave conflicting accounts about the night, with John reporting that he verbally asked Jane for consent.
The panel determined in November that John “did not know or reasonably should not have known that Complainant was incapacitated,” but also determined he “more likely than not” violated sexual consent code of conduct policies. The panel also determined John allowed that photo to be taken.
His punishment included a four-year suspension, a no-contact order with Jane Doe, and a prohibition to be on campus during the suspension. For a copy of the current lawsuit, click here… 395469534-John-Doe-v-Indiana-University-Title-IX-Violation-Complaint
For the full article, click here…